<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Lawyers in Vancouver &#187; US-Canada Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/category/us-canada-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com</link>
	<description>American Lawyers in Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:58:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>COMPARATIVE BAD FAITH LAW: BAD FAITH REFUSAL TO SETTLE; COMPARING Shea (BC) with Besel (WA) &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/05/04/comparative-bad-faith-law-bad-faith-refusal-to-settle-comparing-shea-bc-with-besel-wa-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/05/04/comparative-bad-faith-law-bad-faith-refusal-to-settle-comparing-shea-bc-with-besel-wa-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad faith law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a continuation of the last post looking at Comparative Bad Faith Law in BC and Washington. We&#8217;ll now move onto the comparison with Besel v. Viking Insurance&#8230;
COMPARE  Besel v. Viking Insurance, 146 Wn.2d 730 (2002)
Basic facts:
D, insured by Viking, crashes his pickup truck and injures his passenger, Besel.  Viking did not respond to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/05/04/comparative-bad-faith-law-bad-faith-refusal-to-settle-comparing-shea-bc-with-besel-wa-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMPARATIVE BAD FAITH LAW: BAD FAITH REFUSAL TO SETTLE; COMPARING Shea (BC) with Besel (WA)</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/27/comparative-bad-faith-law-part1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/27/comparative-bad-faith-law-part1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad faith law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be a two part post. First an introduction will be provided and then the outline of Shea v. M.P.I.C., 55 B.C.L.R. (2d) 15 (1991). In the second part of this post (coming next week) a comparison will be made with Besel v. Viking Insurance, 146 Wn.2d 730 (2002) and then we&#8217;ll explore how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/27/comparative-bad-faith-law-part1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WASHINGTON BAD FAITH LAW: 4 Sensible Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/20/washington-bad-faith-law-4-sensible-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/20/washington-bad-faith-law-4-sensible-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad faith law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc washington lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question #1:
Is it possible to bring a bad faith claim for acts which are not specifically proscribed by the Washington Administrative Code?
ANSWER: Absolutely. The WAC’s only set minimum standards for insurer conduct, and compliance with the WAC’s alone does not guarantee an insurer has avoided a bad faith claim.  The duty to act in good [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/20/washington-bad-faith-law-4-sensible-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INSURANCE BAD FAITH: Washington vs. BC (continued)</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/13/insurance-bad-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/13/insurance-bad-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance bad faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington vs bc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a continuation from my last post on insurance bad faith in Washington and British Columbia
(11) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring an insured, claimant, or the physician of either to submit a preliminary claim report and then requiring subsequent submissions which contain substantially the same information.
 (12) Failing to promptly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/13/insurance-bad-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INSURANCE BAD FAITH : Washington vs British Columbia</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/08/insurance-bad-faith-washington-vs-british-columbia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/08/insurance-bad-faith-washington-vs-british-columbia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance bad faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington vs bc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington legislature vests the (elected) Washington State Insurance Commissioner with the authority to issue regulations identifying acts an insurer may commit which violate the duties of good faith and fair dealing.  The following acts have been specifically identified as such in the Washington Administrative Code with respect to the settlement of claims; other provisions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/08/insurance-bad-faith-washington-vs-british-columbia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 COMMENTS ON COLOSSUS AND THE USE OF “ADJUSTING SOFTWARE” BY U.S. INSURERS</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/02/comments-on-colossus-adjusting-software-by-us-insurers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/02/comments-on-colossus-adjusting-software-by-us-insurers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjusting software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american insurance adjuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colossus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us personal injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning in the early to mid 1990&#8217;s, many insurers in the United States began using computerized claims adjusting software to assist them in keeping payouts on small to moderate personal injury claims more modest.  CSC Corporation’s Colossus program was the best-known, and most widely discussed, of the claim adjusting programs – but while some companies [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/04/02/comments-on-colossus-adjusting-software-by-us-insurers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SETTLING MODEST U.S. PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS WITHOUT A U.S. LAWYER – 4 THINGS TO CONSIDER</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/31/settling-modest-us-personal-injury-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/31/settling-modest-us-personal-injury-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american insurance adjuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance bad faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multijurisdictional civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us defendant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an article that Wyatt Pickett and I wrote a while ago. I think you&#8217;ll find it interesting&#8230;
At Cross Border Law, our practice focuses on complex multijurisdictional civil litigation that implicates interests on both sides of the U.S.-Canadian border.  Yet we’re often confronted with questions – either directly from potential clients, or from referring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/31/settling-modest-us-personal-injury-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UMP, ICBC AND MORE</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/27/ump-icbc-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/27/ump-icbc-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underinsurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing on from where I left off in the last article &#8220;Canadian Client Injured in America&#8220;
All About UMP
Most importantly, you need to be mindful of the way that underinsurance (UMP) works for all BC residents.  You cannot settle a US action for policy limits without first obtaining ICBC&#8217;s consent; otherwise, you risk forfeiting your client&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/27/ump-icbc-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STEPS TO TAKE WHEN YOUR  CANADIAN CLIENT IS INJURED IN AMERICA</title>
		<link>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/25/essential-steps-to-take-when-your-canadian-client-is-injured-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/25/essential-steps-to-take-when-your-canadian-client-is-injured-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Samuels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips For Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Canada Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc washington lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsaj event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wstla event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the next couple of posts I&#8217;m going to include information from a recent presentation I gave at a Washington State Trial Lawyers Association (WSTLA) event &#8211; they are now called the Washington State Association for Justice (WSAJ).
There are reportedly more than 5,000 accidents per year for British Columbians outside of the Province, and I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawyersvancouver.com/2009/03/25/essential-steps-to-take-when-your-canadian-client-is-injured-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
